🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations resume.

Trump recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He said the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the final solution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."